Post by messi05 on Jan 23, 2024 23:51:24 GMT -6
ProUni scholarship holders can only transfer if the two universities agree and if there is a vacancy at the destination institution. With this understanding, the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region denied, last week, the request to transfer a scholarship holder from Ulbra, in Canoas (RS), to Univali, in Itajaí (SC). The student, who is studying Medicine, wanted to participate in the external transfer process, a way of joining Univali. However, the institution prohibits the participation of medical students who receive scholarships from ProUni. The scholarship holder filed a lawsuit at the 2nd Federal Court of Itajaí requesting a writ of mandamus ordering Univali to participate in the external transfer process for the second half of 2017.
The request was rejected, leading the author to Buy Phone Number List appeal to the TRF-4. She claims that the requirement for consent from the institutions involved has no legal basis. According to the rapporteur of the case at TRF-4, federal judge summoned Sérgio Renato Tejada Garcia, there is no abusive or illegal act, since the rule governing ProUni, Ordinance 19/2008 of the MEC, presupposes the transfer of usufruct of the program beneficiary's scholarship, the consent of both educational institutions involved and the existence of a vacancy. “As the author does not have the consent of both educational institutions, in addition to there being no vacancy in the intended institution, in accordance with the regulations, there is no need to talk about a clear and certain right to be supported by a writ of mandamus”, stated the judge.
A sector that currently owes R$16.5 billion in taxes. Legal competence AGU also argued that Anvisa edited the resolution within its competence. The law creating the regulatory agency (Law 9,782/99) established that its purpose is to “promote the health of the population, through the sanitary control of the production and marketing of products” and with the objective of eliminating, reducing or preventing risks to individual and collective health. Article 7, item Finally, the AGU highlights that the edition of the questioned resolution was preceded by a public hearing that was attended by more than 400 participants, including representatives of the tobacco industry. And that the restriction is reasonable, as it only affects additives that alter the taste and aroma of cigarettes, and not those considered essential for the manufacture of the products themselves.
The request was rejected, leading the author to Buy Phone Number List appeal to the TRF-4. She claims that the requirement for consent from the institutions involved has no legal basis. According to the rapporteur of the case at TRF-4, federal judge summoned Sérgio Renato Tejada Garcia, there is no abusive or illegal act, since the rule governing ProUni, Ordinance 19/2008 of the MEC, presupposes the transfer of usufruct of the program beneficiary's scholarship, the consent of both educational institutions involved and the existence of a vacancy. “As the author does not have the consent of both educational institutions, in addition to there being no vacancy in the intended institution, in accordance with the regulations, there is no need to talk about a clear and certain right to be supported by a writ of mandamus”, stated the judge.
A sector that currently owes R$16.5 billion in taxes. Legal competence AGU also argued that Anvisa edited the resolution within its competence. The law creating the regulatory agency (Law 9,782/99) established that its purpose is to “promote the health of the population, through the sanitary control of the production and marketing of products” and with the objective of eliminating, reducing or preventing risks to individual and collective health. Article 7, item Finally, the AGU highlights that the edition of the questioned resolution was preceded by a public hearing that was attended by more than 400 participants, including representatives of the tobacco industry. And that the restriction is reasonable, as it only affects additives that alter the taste and aroma of cigarettes, and not those considered essential for the manufacture of the products themselves.